The Murder of Andrew Breitbart

   A journalist suddenly dies at the age of 43. He passed out on a public street and subsequently dies of heart failure. Why is that newsworthy? He died on the day he was supposed to reveal a film exposing the newly-elected president of the United States, Barack Obama.

   Who was Andrew Breitbart? Breitbart was a conservative American publisher, author, and occasional guest commentator on various news programs. He was a researcher for Arianna Huffington of The Huffington Post. Breitbart owned the news aggregation site, Breitbart.com, and five other websites: Breitbart.tv, Big Hollywood, Big Government, Big Journalism, and Big Peace. He played key roles in the Anthony Weiner scandal, the resignation of Shirley Sherrod, and the ACORN 2009 undercover videos controversy.

   According to Breitbart.com, on March 1, 2012, Andrew collapsed while walking in Brentwood. He was rushed to Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, but did not recover. An autopsy by the Los Angeles County Coroner's Office showed that he had cardiomegaly and died of heart failure. The toxicology report showed "No prescription or illicit drugs were detected. The blood alcohol was .04%. No significant trauma was present and foul play is not suspected."

   No one in the establishment’s media dared to ask the question that everyone should have been asking, what is the likelihood a highly respected investigative journalist would simply keel over dead, at a relatively young age, on the very day he was supposedly set to expose humiliating and potentially incriminating video footage of the incumbent president from his college days as a young radical activist?

    Breitbart’s death would have accepted as the result of natural causes, as the media was trying desperately to propose, despite the extraordinarily unlikely coincidence, but another death added to the conspiracy. The corner of the autopsy was poisoned and died two days after the autopsy. Convenient.
Who may have killed Andrew Breitbart? Why would they kill him? Perhaps the most interesting question, what exactly was contained in those videos?

   The world may never know. The video’s release was delayed over an“argument” about the film’s eventual rating. When it was ultimately released the footage was virtually harmless. Was that the film Breitbart had initially intended? Not likely. The unedited version may never see the light of day.

   The video below shows Andrew Breitbart talking about the tapes he had in possession:

Libya Done - Syria Next?

   The swirl of controversy surrounding the viral web-scam of "Kony 2012" has given birth to new projects of a similar propaganda, including a proposed documentary by an ex-U.S. mercenary (formerly operating under NATO) who puppeted Libyan insurgents into destroying their home country. Another is in the works by ex-Condor Security operatives with known ties to a civilian massacre of unarmed Afghan Civilians. Both of these were immediately covered up to protect government defense contracts that fall outside accepted military guidelines. Both are now setting sights on destroying Syria.



  Syria is not a ‘public revolution’ but rather herds of mercenaries come to destroy this independent nation by wrecking havoc and inflicting strife among its communities. Despite the fact that rebels have carried out massacres and bombings as well as summary executions of pro-Assad captives, these propaganda pieces look to cast these monsters as “very human.”

  Even with a massive establishment media public relations campaign to quell attacks, insurgents are failing to make much progress against government forces in major cities. This is presumably why the military-industrial complex and extra-military mercenaries are being called upon to launch a new propaganda offensive aimed at legitimizing a NATO invasion.

   Expect happy-clappy emotional manipulation to hoodwink viewers. Watch closely how the hands of the RAND Corporation and the Titor Conglomerate use the liberal media to characterize Syrian rebels as democratic "freedom fighters," when in reality they are largely comprised of opportunists and foreign insurgents doing the bidding of NATO in toppling Syria as the next phase of the contrived “Arab spring.”

Bush 2004 Re-Election Rigged

   The 2004 U.S. Presidential Election was clearly a conspiracy, a fix to elect George W. Bush into office. There are many theories to why the Bush/Gore election was a sham. Some of the most compelling evidence resides in the state of Florida and the now infamous Presidential Recount. The election was finally decided in the state that was governed by Jeb Bush, George’s own brother. More conspicuous, though, was the need for George W. Bush to be in office, continuing with New World Order. He was needed/selected to conquer the Middle East, a task his father, George Bush Sr. had started years earlier with the Gulf War (yet, had been unsuccessful). The sole mastermind behind the ordeal was none other than Secretary of Defense for George H.W. Bush and V.P. for W. Bush, Dick Cheney.

   Why Bush? What is the New World Order?

   The Bilderberg Group is a highly exclusive annual gathering of 100 of the richest and most influential people around the world. The New World Order is a secretive agenda by many of those same people to create one world army, one power to dominate all countries and armies.

   The following video shows some of what the NWO is capable of doing.




   Bush was chosen by the Bilderberg Group in 1999 and the New World Order was not going to allow him to lose the election. After having Bill Clinton sign the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 the government needed a republican in office to enforce and/or start a war in the Middle East, a deliberate continuation of George Bush Sr.’s plan during his time in office.

   How did George win Florida?

   Jeb Bush for months had claimed there was “no way possible” George could lose Florida. He reiterated that statement during the night of the election. This statement was made again in the documentary, “Queen of Versailles.” David Siegel (at the time one of the richest men in America) says, ”I am singled-handedly responsible for the election of George W. Bush.” He is then asked how exactly he ‘got George W. Bush elected president’. “I’d rather not say it. It may not necessarily have been legal.”

   On Election night, Bush is announced as the winner in Florida on Fox News nearly 30 minutes before the official release has been issued by the Department of Elections. The votes hadn’t been fully counted, yet, somehow, Fox News knew the outcome of the election. As if more evidence was needed, Katherine Harris, who oversaw the election process in Florida, has been investigated for denying nearly 90,000 people the ability to vote in the Bush/Gore election due to “conflicting names on a felon database.”

   The facts speak for themselves.

Sandy Hook Conspiracy

Evidence has emerged that the Sandy Hook shooting in Newtown, Connecticut may have been a staged event or a Government setup. The government wanted to enforce stronger gun laws and to boost the economy by causing a surge of sales of the AR-15 rifle by limiting the quantity of those rifles due to the impending banning. The media repeatedly insinuated the murder weapon was an AR-15 when, in actuality, ballistic specialists determined all the shots came from two handguns. Furthermore, on Jan. 7, 2013 the video titled “The Sandy Hook Shooting- Fully Exposed” was posted on YouTube and contained news clips to point out inconsistencies in the Sandy Hook coverage.



“The classic conspiracy theorist sees the hidden hand in everything. Nothing is as it seems,” Benjamin Radford, author of “Media Mythmakers” and deputy editor of the Skeptical Inquirer, told The Huffington Post. “There’s something bigger that’s going on. They don’t know where it is, but they are willing to tantalize people and throw out any number of suggestions, which are oftentimes contradictory.”

ThinkOutsideTheTv posted some questions that were in the video, which include: How Adam Lanza’s AR-15 rifle got locked in his trunk (later proven to be an extra shotgun); If grieving Newtown citizens are really just “crisis actors” (targeted hero Gene Rosen is actually a retired psychologist);

Is this a tactic of the US Government to take away our freedoms of the 2nd Amendment to keep us from protecting ourselves? Was this a setup to cause hysteria amongst the public to needlessly purchase weapons and boost the economy?

Bigfoot Witness Interviewed

TeamTazerBigFoot just posted this and I wanted to link it up for my readers right away:

http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2012/03/teamtazerbigfoots-incredible-interview.html

UFO video (London/Thames)

Captured just days ago, this video is from YouTuber space99dude.



This is the same footage sources are saying CNN will not air.

More Gov't Support? More Privatized "Security"?

   This month, Mr. Karzai called a loya jirga, the traditional grand council of Afghan elders and leaders, in an attempt to gain popular support for a long-term U.S. military presence in Afghanistan. More than 2,000 delegates supported Mr. Karzai’s strategic vision for an American presence, though the conditions he proposed — including an end to house searches and night raids by American forces and an insistence that the Afghan government be in charge of all detainees — are unlikely to be acceptable to American officials. The second issue debated by the jirga, how to restart peace talks with the Taliban, was inconclusive.

   The months that preceded the loya jirga were notable for their violence. Aug. 6, 2011, was the deadliest day for American forces in the nearly decade-long war: insurgents shot down a Chinook transport helicopter, killing 30 Americans, including some Navy Seal commandos from the unit that killed Osama bin Laden, as well as 8 Afghans.

   In August a series of attacks by insurgents killed numerous civilians, but for the most part failed against military targets. In Kabul, on Aug. 19, the Taliban claimed responsibility for an attack on the British Council, a British government agency promoting education, culture and the arts. Suicide bombers stepped up attacks in southern Afghanistan in advance of the end of Ramadan. But though Afghan security forces were the intended targets, civilians took the biggest toll.

   On Sept. 13, insurgents launched a complex assault against the American Embassy and the nearby NATO headquarters, pelting the heavily guarded compounds with rockets in an attack that raised new questions about the security of Afghanistan’s capital and the Westerners working there.

   A week later, an unidentified attacker killed the Burhanuddi Rabbani, the leader of Afghanistan’s High Peace Council, a former president of the country whose main responsibility was negotiating a political end to the war with the Taliban. The attack was a serious blow to any notion of reconciliation with the Taliban.