Big Brother is Watching You!

The movie entitled Minority Report predicted who would commit crimes and stopped them before they did it.  The film was set in 2054. Welcome to 2054. Law enforcers in two States are using crime-prediction software to predict which freed prisoners are most likely to commit murder, and supervising them accordingly.

Instead of relying on parole officers to decide how much supervision inmates will need to prevent future crimes, a new system uses a computer algorithm to decide for them. The Minority Report-style software is already being used in Baltimore and Philadelphia to predict future murderers, and will be extended to Washington D.C. soon.  It has been developed by Professor Richard Berk, a criminologist at the University of Pennsylvania, who believes it will reduce the murder rate and those of other crimes.

Prof. Berk says his algorithm could be used to help set bail amounts and also decide sentences in the future.  It could also be modified to predict lesser crimes.  He told ABC News that currently parole officers are using their own judgment to decide what level of supervision each parolee should have, based on their criminal record.  His software replaces that 'ad-hoc' decision making, and should identify eight future murderers out of 100.

Berk says:

"People assume that if someone murdered then they will murder in the future, but what really matters is what that person did as a young individual.

If they committed armed robbery at age 14, that's a good predictor.

If they committed the same crime at age 30, that doesn't predict very much."

Prof. Berk's researchers used the details of more than 60,000 crimes then wrote an algorithm to find the people behind the crimes who were more likely to commit murder when they were out of prison.  Criteria including criminal record, type of crime, location, and age at which the individual committed the crime were analysed, with type of crime and age proving to be the most reliable predictors of future crime.  He said even his students at the University of Pennsylvania compared his work to Minority Report, the 2002 film starring Tom Cruise in which gifted humans called 'PreCogs' can see into the future and predict who will commit crimes.  Prof. Berk's work has been described as 'very impressive' by Shawn Bushway, a professor of criminal justice at the State University of New York at Albany.  However he cautioned that human rights campaigners might see that the extra supervision mandated by the software for those deemed most likely to murder might amount to harassment.

The government is slowly taking away all our privacies. Even those who have served their time are labelled future criminals based off of software. What will happen when the computers say YOU are a future criminal? No longer are we free-will thinkers, we are only a product of algorithms in a computer, waiting for us to make the wrong move. It may be only a matter of time until we are all imprisoned.

'Dark Knight' shooting a staged U.S. Gov't plot?

   The early morning on Friday July 20 in Aurora, Colorado, James Holmes, armed with a shotgun, an automatic rifle, and a handgun, entered a movie theater during a showing of the “Dark Knight” and opened fire. The shooting was the cause of much hysteria and confusion. When the admitted gunman turned himself in only minutes later, more questions began flying than bullets. The Internet is rife with speculation that the U.S. government somehow had a hand in this horrific bloodshed.

   Perhaps the magnitude of the loss of life and the sudden violence perpetrated lends itself to seeking a more substantial target to blame than one deranged young man. Certainly this senseless brutality by a seemingly normal guy-next-door is a hard pill to swallow. Still, given the history of this nation’s proclivity towards scandal and cover-up, it is easy to see how some people give credence to such a possibility.

   Too many occurrences do not add up. At the time of the shooting, James Holmes was an unemployed medical student at the University of Colorado, pursuing a PhD in neuroscience.  How does an unemployed college student afford the expensive weaponry and tactical gear, and where does he get the training to use it? This is a valid question proffered by Mike Adams of NaturalNews.com:

"How does an unemployed medical student afford all the complex weapons gear, bomb-making gear, "flammable" booby trap devices, ammunition, multiple magazines, bullet-proof vest, groin protection, ballistic helmet, SWAT uniform and all the rest of it?""A decent AR-15 rifle costs $1,000 or more all by itself. The shotgun and handgun might run another $800 total. Spare mags, sights, slings, and so on will run you at least another $1,000 across three firearms. The bullet-proof vest is easily another $800, and the cost of the bomb-making gear is any body's guess. With all the specialty body gear, ammunition, booby-trap devices and more, I'm guessing this is at least $20,000 in weapons and tactical gear, much of which is very difficult for civilians to get in the first place."

   As part of the attack, Holmes painted his hair red and referred to himself as "The Joker," one of the arch enemies in the DC Comics-inspired Batman movie series.  Holmes wore bullet-proof attire yet he peacefully surrendered to police after the shooting, and subsequently warned authorities that his apartment was booby-trapped. Why would a shooter, hell-bent on "killing everyone," casually surrender to police then warn them of his booby-trapped apartment? Such a question implies a level of sanity in an otherwise deranged mind.

The argument is that this is a government ploy to bolster support for the upcoming U.N. vote on the “global small arms treaty” which could extrapolate to American citizens losing their right to bear arms. Ridding our constitutional right to bear arms is the first step in the government gaining complete control over all U.S. citizens, as people would lose their ability to defend themselves.  The gun debate and the Obama Administration vowing to overhaul gun control is proof that our rights are quickly being stripped away. Was this shooting the first step in the process of complete government takeover? Will the New World Order come into fruition?

   Only time will tell.

The Murder of Andrew Breitbart

   A journalist suddenly dies at the age of 43. He passed out on a public street and subsequently dies of heart failure. Why is that newsworthy? He died on the day he was supposed to reveal a film exposing the newly-elected president of the United States, Barack Obama.

   Who was Andrew Breitbart? Breitbart was a conservative American publisher, author, and occasional guest commentator on various news programs. He was a researcher for Arianna Huffington of The Huffington Post. Breitbart owned the news aggregation site, Breitbart.com, and five other websites: Breitbart.tv, Big Hollywood, Big Government, Big Journalism, and Big Peace. He played key roles in the Anthony Weiner scandal, the resignation of Shirley Sherrod, and the ACORN 2009 undercover videos controversy.

   According to Breitbart.com, on March 1, 2012, Andrew collapsed while walking in Brentwood. He was rushed to Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, but did not recover. An autopsy by the Los Angeles County Coroner's Office showed that he had cardiomegaly and died of heart failure. The toxicology report showed "No prescription or illicit drugs were detected. The blood alcohol was .04%. No significant trauma was present and foul play is not suspected."

   No one in the establishment’s media dared to ask the question that everyone should have been asking, what is the likelihood a highly respected investigative journalist would simply keel over dead, at a relatively young age, on the very day he was supposedly set to expose humiliating and potentially incriminating video footage of the incumbent president from his college days as a young radical activist?

    Breitbart’s death would have accepted as the result of natural causes, as the media was trying desperately to propose, despite the extraordinarily unlikely coincidence, but another death added to the conspiracy. The corner of the autopsy was poisoned and died two days after the autopsy. Convenient.
Who may have killed Andrew Breitbart? Why would they kill him? Perhaps the most interesting question, what exactly was contained in those videos?

   The world may never know. The video’s release was delayed over an“argument” about the film’s eventual rating. When it was ultimately released the footage was virtually harmless. Was that the film Breitbart had initially intended? Not likely. The unedited version may never see the light of day.

   The video below shows Andrew Breitbart talking about the tapes he had in possession:

Libya Done - Syria Next?

   The swirl of controversy surrounding the viral web-scam of "Kony 2012" has given birth to new projects of a similar propaganda, including a proposed documentary by an ex-U.S. mercenary (formerly operating under NATO) who puppeted Libyan insurgents into destroying their home country. Another is in the works by ex-Condor Security operatives with known ties to a civilian massacre of unarmed Afghan Civilians. Both of these were immediately covered up to protect government defense contracts that fall outside accepted military guidelines. Both are now setting sights on destroying Syria.



  Syria is not a ‘public revolution’ but rather herds of mercenaries come to destroy this independent nation by wrecking havoc and inflicting strife among its communities. Despite the fact that rebels have carried out massacres and bombings as well as summary executions of pro-Assad captives, these propaganda pieces look to cast these monsters as “very human.”

  Even with a massive establishment media public relations campaign to quell attacks, insurgents are failing to make much progress against government forces in major cities. This is presumably why the military-industrial complex and extra-military mercenaries are being called upon to launch a new propaganda offensive aimed at legitimizing a NATO invasion.

   Expect happy-clappy emotional manipulation to hoodwink viewers. Watch closely how the hands of the RAND Corporation and the Titor Conglomerate use the liberal media to characterize Syrian rebels as democratic "freedom fighters," when in reality they are largely comprised of opportunists and foreign insurgents doing the bidding of NATO in toppling Syria as the next phase of the contrived “Arab spring.”

Bush 2004 Re-Election Rigged

   The 2004 U.S. Presidential Election was clearly a conspiracy, a fix to elect George W. Bush into office. There are many theories to why the Bush/Gore election was a sham. Some of the most compelling evidence resides in the state of Florida and the now infamous Presidential Recount. The election was finally decided in the state that was governed by Jeb Bush, George’s own brother. More conspicuous, though, was the need for George W. Bush to be in office, continuing with New World Order. He was needed/selected to conquer the Middle East, a task his father, George Bush Sr. had started years earlier with the Gulf War (yet, had been unsuccessful). The sole mastermind behind the ordeal was none other than Secretary of Defense for George H.W. Bush and V.P. for W. Bush, Dick Cheney.

   Why Bush? What is the New World Order?

   The Bilderberg Group is a highly exclusive annual gathering of 100 of the richest and most influential people around the world. The New World Order is a secretive agenda by many of those same people to create one world army, one power to dominate all countries and armies.

   The following video shows some of what the NWO is capable of doing.




   Bush was chosen by the Bilderberg Group in 1999 and the New World Order was not going to allow him to lose the election. After having Bill Clinton sign the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 the government needed a republican in office to enforce and/or start a war in the Middle East, a deliberate continuation of George Bush Sr.’s plan during his time in office.

   How did George win Florida?

   Jeb Bush for months had claimed there was “no way possible” George could lose Florida. He reiterated that statement during the night of the election. This statement was made again in the documentary, “Queen of Versailles.” David Siegel (at the time one of the richest men in America) says, ”I am singled-handedly responsible for the election of George W. Bush.” He is then asked how exactly he ‘got George W. Bush elected president’. “I’d rather not say it. It may not necessarily have been legal.”

   On Election night, Bush is announced as the winner in Florida on Fox News nearly 30 minutes before the official release has been issued by the Department of Elections. The votes hadn’t been fully counted, yet, somehow, Fox News knew the outcome of the election. As if more evidence was needed, Katherine Harris, who oversaw the election process in Florida, has been investigated for denying nearly 90,000 people the ability to vote in the Bush/Gore election due to “conflicting names on a felon database.”

   The facts speak for themselves.

Sandy Hook Conspiracy

Evidence has emerged that the Sandy Hook shooting in Newtown, Connecticut may have been a staged event or a Government setup. The government wanted to enforce stronger gun laws and to boost the economy by causing a surge of sales of the AR-15 rifle by limiting the quantity of those rifles due to the impending banning. The media repeatedly insinuated the murder weapon was an AR-15 when, in actuality, ballistic specialists determined all the shots came from two handguns. Furthermore, on Jan. 7, 2013 the video titled “The Sandy Hook Shooting- Fully Exposed” was posted on YouTube and contained news clips to point out inconsistencies in the Sandy Hook coverage.



“The classic conspiracy theorist sees the hidden hand in everything. Nothing is as it seems,” Benjamin Radford, author of “Media Mythmakers” and deputy editor of the Skeptical Inquirer, told The Huffington Post. “There’s something bigger that’s going on. They don’t know where it is, but they are willing to tantalize people and throw out any number of suggestions, which are oftentimes contradictory.”

ThinkOutsideTheTv posted some questions that were in the video, which include: How Adam Lanza’s AR-15 rifle got locked in his trunk (later proven to be an extra shotgun); If grieving Newtown citizens are really just “crisis actors” (targeted hero Gene Rosen is actually a retired psychologist);

Is this a tactic of the US Government to take away our freedoms of the 2nd Amendment to keep us from protecting ourselves? Was this a setup to cause hysteria amongst the public to needlessly purchase weapons and boost the economy?