Friday, February 15, 2013

The Murder of Andrew Breitbart

   A journalist suddenly dies at the age of 43. He passed out on a public street and subsequently dies of heart failure. Why is that newsworthy? He died on the day he was supposed to reveal a film exposing the newly-elected president of the United States, Barack Obama.

   Who was Andrew Breitbart? Breitbart was a conservative American publisher, author, and occasional guest commentator on various news programs. He was a researcher for Arianna Huffington of The Huffington Post. Breitbart owned the news aggregation site,, and five other websites:, Big Hollywood, Big Government, Big Journalism, and Big Peace. He played key roles in the Anthony Weiner scandal, the resignation of Shirley Sherrod, and the ACORN 2009 undercover videos controversy.

   According to, on March 1, 2012, Andrew collapsed while walking in Brentwood. He was rushed to Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, but did not recover. An autopsy by the Los Angeles County Coroner's Office showed that he had cardiomegaly and died of heart failure. The toxicology report showed "No prescription or illicit drugs were detected. The blood alcohol was .04%. No significant trauma was present and foul play is not suspected."
   No one in the establishment’s media dared to ask the question that everyone should have been asking, what is the likelihood a highly respected investigative journalist would simply keel over dead, at a relatively young age, on the very day he was supposedly set to expose humiliating and potentially incriminating video footage of the incumbent president from his college days as a young radical activist?

    Breitbart’s death would have accepted as the result of natural causes, as the media was trying desperately to propose, despite the extraordinarily unlikely coincidence, but another death added to the conspiracy. The corner of the autopsy was poisoned and died two days after the autopsy. Convenient.
Who may have killed Andrew Breitbart? Why would they kill him? Perhaps the most interesting question, what exactly was contained in those videos?

   The world may never know. The video’s release was delayed over an“argument” about the film’s eventual rating. When it was ultimately released the footage was virtually harmless. Was that the film Breitbart had initially intended? Not likely. The unedited version may never see the light of day.

   The video below shows Andrew Breitbart talking about the tapes he had in possession:

No comments:

Post a Comment